Simple: It puts out a lot of heat and boils my water quickly. I am not a gear wonk nor do I keep statistics from boils on my kitchen table. I did not measure the amount of actual heat; it is an observation based on how hot the flames might be. If you want more precise and quantified statistics measured in a controlled setting, I am afrqid I am not that person. I just know what worked for me in the field vs. Other stoves I used in the field.
Ps. Sorry, not familiar with who or what Tetkoba might be. I rarely watch gear videos .

“However, I am more impressed by the stove. The Toaks Siphon Stove puts out more heat while using less fuel than any other individual alcohol stove I used.”

Are you referring to any other alcohol stove, manufactured or homemade, that you’ve tried? I’m having trouble understanding how this Toaks could be “more effecient” given that they’re all basically the same design. Doesn’t Tetkoba show how to make one virtually identical to this on his YouTube channel? I suppose the number and size of the jets could explain greater fuel effeciency, but how then could it put out more heat?

Or maybe you’re referring to the whole system as more effecient … I guess I could see that, but you are talking just about the stove in the quote. Please help me understand. Thanks.

For me, no. But Toaks offers a different pot stand that works for larger pots.

Flatcat Gear’s system has a bit more pot versatility compared to the Caldera Cone, where each cone is specifically designed to fit one pot diameter only. The bake/simmer ring for his alcohol stove also gives the system a wider range of cooking abilities compared to just boiling water.

It’s interesting to see Toaks using a simple “hardware cloth” pot stand. That the same type I used when I was tinkering and building my own alcohol stove & pot setups. They’re lousy for Foster’s can pots because the narrow diameter makes them too unstable.

Did you observe any pot stability issues with that setup?