Alcohol stove alternative – Hornet BRS-3000t

In recent years, open flame stoves have often been banned by many jurisdictions under certain conditions.

This means, for all intents and purposes, that the simple and very light alcohol stoves favored by lightweight backpackers may not always be a good option.

A person could take a traditional canister stove (roughly 3oz) or simply go stoveless.

Either options works.  But now there is another option that may work well for solo backpackers.  Mainly for the person who wishes to heat up a cup of water or two and still go very light: The Hornet BRS-3000t canister stove.

A simple stove of less than 1 oz (25g), the Hornet BRS-3000t uses the standard isobutane fuel canisters used by more well-known stoves such as the Jetboil or the MSR Pocket Rocket.

The Hornet BRS-3000t stove is also very small. Easily fitting in a cook pot with a 4 oz fuel canister.

brs3000t-002

With a Mini-Bic lighter.

I used the stove on a recent trip to make my food at night, make some tea, cook some oatmeal the following morning and heat up water for coffee.

brs3000t-003

Here’s what I found:

  • The heat output worked pretty well with enough control from “blast” to “low flame“. My water heated up in a manner that was quick enough for me.
  • No Piezoelectric starter. Not a negative for me; may be for others.
  • Though the flame does go very low, I would not call it a stove for simmering. The small head of the stove means the flame is concentrated and not spread out. In other words, would not be ideal for cooking.
  • In a similar vein, the small head does not allow for good pot support. A one-quart pot is about as big as a person may want. Have to be careful.

brs3000t-001

OverallThe stove is good for simple, “boil and cook”  type meals when solo backpacking. The stove is not as versatile as other canister stoves, but the stove could be a very good alternative to an alcohol stove for the solo backpacker in many situations. At only ~$15 +/-, the stove is very affordable too.

I see this stove as a good tool to have in the kit. I don’t always want to go stoveless during fire bans. And on trips with a friend or two, sometimes I just want to have hot food.

If I am going on a trip with more cooking/bigger pots, I’ll continue to take my trusty Coleman F1.

UPDATE APRIL 2018: Three years later, I’ve used this stove consistently. No issues. Not as fuel efficient as other stoves, but for simple “boil and cook” type meals, it works just fine.

Wanting more technical details about the stove? Check out this link.

Disclosure: This stove was purchased with my own funds.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JB
JB
8 years ago

You should check out the Snow Peak LITEMAX TITANIUM STOVE. It’s lighter (although not as cheap) and performs well. I’ve been using one for years and it’s provided me with lots of maintenance free use. It boils 2 cups of water in about 3 min at altitude, which isn’t bad either.

SQWIB
SQWIB
8 years ago
Reply to  JB

@JB
The Litemax titanium is 1.2 x heavier than the BRS3000T

BRS3000T = 0.88 oz. (25g)
Litemax 1.9 OZ = (54G)

George
George
8 years ago
Reply to  SQWIB

That’s 2.16X heavier, not 1.2X

backpacker98
backpacker98
3 years ago
Reply to  JB

brs 3000t can 4 cup at altitude 2 minutes 28 seconds

chris
chris
4 years ago

I carry 2 of these stoves on extended backpacking trips. Weight is basically negligible (2 of them are still less than than the 2nd lightest on the market), and the price is so low! Have hiked more than 500 miles with one and zero issues.